🔗 Share this article

January 30th, 1972 stands as among the most fatal – and significant – occasions during thirty years of conflict in this area.

Throughout the area where events unfolded – the legacy of the tragic events are displayed on the structures and etched in public consciousness.

A public gathering was organized on a wintry, sunny period in Derry.

The protest was opposing the policy of imprisonment without charges – detaining individuals without due process – which had been put in place in response to multiple years of violence.

Troops from the Parachute Regiment shot dead multiple civilians in the neighborhood – which was, and still is, a strongly Irish nationalist population.

A particular photograph became particularly prominent.

Photographs showed a religious figure, Fr Edward Daly, waving a blood-stained cloth while attempting to shield a crowd carrying a youth, Jackie Duddy, who had been mortally injured.

News camera operators captured much footage on the day.

Documented accounts includes the priest telling a reporter that troops "appeared to discharge weapons randomly" and he was "totally convinced" that there was no reason for the discharge of weapons.

The narrative of events was disputed by the initial investigation.

The Widgery Tribunal determined the soldiers had been shot at first.

Throughout the resolution efforts, the administration established a fresh examination, in response to advocacy by bereaved relatives, who said the initial inquiry had been a inadequate investigation.

In 2010, the findings by the investigation said that generally, the soldiers had discharged weapons initially and that none of the casualties had been armed.

The contemporary government leader, David Cameron, issued an apology in the House of Commons – stating deaths were "without justification and inexcusable."

Law enforcement started to look into the matter.

One former paratrooper, identified as the accused, was prosecuted for homicide.

Accusations were made regarding the fatalities of James Wray, 22, and 26-year-old the second individual.

The accused was also accused of seeking to harm several people, Joseph Friel, Joe Mahon, an additional individual, and an unidentified individual.

Remains a judicial decision preserving the defendant's privacy, which his attorneys have maintained is required because he is at risk of attack.

He stated to the Saville Inquiry that he had exclusively discharged his weapon at persons who were possessing firearms.

The statement was disputed in the concluding document.

Evidence from the examination could not be used straightforwardly as proof in the court case.

In the dock, the accused was shielded from sight using a protective barrier.

He made statements for the first time in court at a hearing in that month, to answer "not guilty" when the accusations were read.

Family members of those who were killed on the incident journeyed from the city to the courthouse each day of the case.

John Kelly, whose sibling was fatally wounded, said they were aware that listening to the trial would be difficult.

"I visualize the events in my memory," the relative said, as we visited the key areas referenced in the trial – from Rossville Street, where his brother was fatally wounded, to the adjacent the area, where one victim and William McKinney were died.

"It even takes me back to my position that day.

"I helped to carry Michael and place him in the ambulance.

"I relived each detail during the proceedings.

"Notwithstanding having to go through the process – it's still valuable for me."